A jury found Daniel Howard Cain guilty of possessing a firearm after having been convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court found him to be an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)*fn1 and sentenced him to 235 months imprisonment. Cain contends that the district court improperly considered a conviction under a Pennsylvania burglary statute as a predicate offense in making its § 924(e) determination. He also raises various trial and sentencing errors. We affirm.